Archive for the ‘Naval Forces’ Category.

South Korea Launches 2nd Aegis Destroyer

By JUNG SUNG-KI
Published: 14 Nov 14:17 EST (19:17 GMT)
Defense News

SEOUL - South Korea’s navy on Nov. 14 launched its second of three planned 7,600-ton Sejong the Great-class Aegis destroyers.

The KDX-III ship, armed with the up-to-date Aegis air warfare defense system, is the core of the Navy’s future “strategic mobile squadrons” consisting of 14,000-ton Dokdo-class landing platform vessels, 4,300-ton KDX-II Gwanggaeto the Great-class destroyers, 1,800-ton Type 214 submarines and other support vessels and anti-submarine Lynx helicopters, Navy officials said.

The modernized squadrons will enable South Korea to conduct blue-water operations both independently and jointly with its allies for purposes such as securing sea lanes for energy supplies, peacekeeping and control of maritime disputes with neighboring countries, they said.

The Navy plans to create a mobile squadron in 2010 and wants at least two more with the commissioning of additional Aegis destroyers, they said.

The lead ship launched in May last year is to be operational with the Navy starting next month, and the second vessel will be in service next year after sea trials, the Navy said in a news release.

A ceremony marking the launch of the second KDX-III ship, named after Yi I, a prominent Confucian scholar of the Joseon Kingdom (1392-1910), was held at a shipyard of Daewoon Shipbuilding and Marine Engineering on Geoje Island, about 500 kilometers south of Seoul, it said.

“I believe Aegis destroyers fitted with state-of-the-art radar and air warfare defense systems will help safeguard our nation and ocean successfully,” President Lee Myung-bak said in his congratulatory message, read by Adm. Jung Ok-keun, the chief of naval operations, during the ceremony. “With the commissioning of the Aegis ships, I hope our military diplomacy will be further expanded.”

The Aegis combat system, built by Lockheed Martin, is the world’s premier surface-to-air and fire-control system, capable of simultaneous operations against aircraft, ballistic and cruise missiles, ships and submarines. Only a few countries, such as the U.S., Spain, Japan and Norway, operate Aegis warships.

The KDX-III destroyer can carry two midsized helicopters and sail at a top speed of 30 knots within a range of 1,000 kilometers. It can carry 300 crew members.

The ship’s SPY-1D radar can track some 1,000 aircraft within a 500-kilometer radius simultaneously, providing full 360-degree coverage.

The 166-meter-long, 21-meter-wide ship can carry about 120 missiles and torpedoes in its Mk 41 Vertical Launch System and domestically-built Korea Vertical Launch System.

Missiles equipping the ship include ship-to-air SM-2 Block IIIA/B Tactical Standard missiles, built by Raytheon Systems, with a range of 170 kilometers; Cheonryong (sky dragon) ship-to-surface cruise missiles with a range of more than 500 kilometers; and Hongsangeo (red shark) long-range ship-to-submarine torpedoes with a target range of 19 kilometers.

Other major armaments include the 150-kilometer-range Hae Seong (sea star) ship-to-ship missiles, RAM Mk 31 guided missiles, a 30-mm “Goalkeeper’” system for engaging incoming sea-skimming anti-ship missiles, and a 5-inch/62-caliber Mk 45 Mod 4 lightweight gun.

The $1 billion stealthy destroyer is also equipped with the domestically-built SLQ-200(V) SONATA electronic warfare system.

Bookmark and Share

Delivery of Components for Two Italian Class 212A Submarines

ThyssenKrupp | Nov 17, 2008

Defence Talk

On 11th November 2008 the Italian shipyard Fincantieri Navali Italiani S.p.A. and the German Submarine Consortium signed a contract in Genoa for the delivery of components for two Class 212A submarines. The German Submarine Consortium for Italy is made up of Howaldtswerke-Deutsche Werft GmbH (HDW) and TKMS Blohm + Voss Nordseewerke GmbH (BVN) – both companies belong to ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems – and MarineForce International LLP.

The German Submarine Consortium for Italy is made up of Howaldtswerke-Deutsche Werft GmbH (HDW) and TKMS Blohm + Voss Nordseewerke GmbH (BVN) – both companies belong to ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems – and MarineForce International LLP.

HDW and BVN will deliver construction documents and components, such as for the fuel cell propulsion system, the torpedo tube bow section and other smaller components for the 2nd batch. This will increase to 24 the number of submarines at sea around the world equipped with an HDW fuel cell propulsion system.

The two Class 212A boats to be built by Fincantieri in Muggiano for the Italian Navy are sister ships to the 1st batch of these submarines. The first two boats were also built in Italy to German specifications and documentation, and they have been in operational service in the Italian Navy since 2006 and 2007. Delivery of the new boats is scheduled for September 2015 and September 2016.

Main characteristics:
Length: approx. 56 m
Height: approx. 11m
Displacement: approx. 1,450 t
Crew: 27

ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems AG, with its head office in Hamburg, Germany, is part of ThyssenKrupp Technologies AG within the ThyssenKrupp Group. With its technological competence, extensive portfolio and continuous innovations the corporate group, being the umbrella organisation for shipyards in Germany, Sweden and Greece and various marine engineering companies, represents one of the leading systems houses in European shipbuilding.

Bookmark and Share

Russia’s ageing navy still packs a deadly punch

Wed Nov 12, 2008 5:07pm GMT

By Dmitry Solovyov

ABOARD THE MOSKVA MISSILE CRUISER (Reuters) - This Russian warship left the shipyard 25 years ago and it shows: the electronics consoles look like museum exhibits and its hull carries a thick crust of paint from years of running repairs.

Its shortcomings reflect the Russian navy’s many problems, highlighted again this month by an accident on a nuclear submarine that killed 20 people.

But looks can deceive. Hidden beneath the decks of the Moskva cruiser are 16 “Bazalt” guided missiles, which travel faster than the speed of sound and can strike an enemy aircraft carrier group 500 km (310 miles) away.

The Moskva, flagship of Russia’s Black Sea Fleet, symbolises Russia’s navy: all too easy to dismiss as an ageing rust-bucket, it can still pack a formidable punch.

The navy’s capability matters now more than at any time since the Cold War because the Kremlin is using it to project Russia’s new-found confidence far beyond its coastal waters, bringing it face-to-face with NATO warships.

“I believe we are treated with respect,” captain of the Moskva Igor Smolyak told a group of visiting journalists when asked what foreign navies made of his vessel. He was standing in front of a 130-mm cannon at the bow of his ship.

“They treat with respect the flag, the ship and — accordingly — our nation,” he said during the visit in late September.

BUTT OF JOKES

When Russia this year sent its nuclear-powered missile cruiser Peter the Great to Venezuela — the first such manoeuvres off the U.S. coast since the Cold War — Washington poked fun.

U.S. State Department spokesman Sean McCormack quipped that it was “very interesting that they found some ships that could actually make it that far down to Venezuela”.

The jokes are not entirely baseless. For years after the Soviet Union ceased to exist, funding for the navy all but dried up. Building new vessels was put on hold and the existing fleet had to languish in port because of a lack of fuel.

The only time the world remembered Russia’s navy was when, as with the sinking of the Kursk submarine in 2000 with the loss of all 118 on board, something went terribly wrong.

Memories of the Kursk disaster were revived on November 8 when 20 people died from gas asphyxiation on board a nuclear submarine undergoing sea trials in the Pacific Ocean.

“We have lost 15 years,” Captain Igor Dygalo, aide to the commander of Russia’s navy said at the Moskva’s mooring in the Ukrainian port of Sevastopol, home port of the Black Sea Fleet.

“Warships are not tanks. They are far more sophisticated and need proper care.”

AGE NO OBSTACLE

But military analysts say what counts with naval power is not the age of the ship but what is inside it.

In the case of the Moskva, — originally called “Slava” or “Glory” when it was launched in 1983 — its officers say its electronics, sensors and weapons have been constantly upgraded.

One of only three missile cruisers of this class in the Russian navy, it bristles with weapons, including anti-submarine bombs, anti-aircraft rockets, six-barrelled anti-air Gatling guns, torpedoes and an on-deck helicopter.

“Due to the power of its strike weapons, the Moskva is called ‘carrier killer’ by NATO,” the captain said.

Nick Brown, editor-in-chief of Jane’s International Defence Review, said the age of the Russian fleet did not necessarily mean it could not fight.

“It’s all about how it’s been maintained,” he said in written comments supplied to Reuters. “The U.S. Navy’s oldest Ticonderoga-class cruisers were launched in the early 1980s and they have plenty of life left.”

“I’m not sure that you can say the same about the Black Sea Fleet, because maintenance and upgrade programmes have been somewhat haphazard. That’s not to say that the fleet is obsolete by any stretch, it’s still a powerful fighting force.”

KEEN RIVALRY

According to official data, Russia’s Black Sea Fleet now comprises about 50 warships and other vessels, up to 80 planes and helicopters and some 13,000 servicemen.

More, and newer, ships are promised as Russia spends some of the huge cash pile it has built up from years of high oil prices on beefing up its military.

President Dmitry Medvedev has ordered the Defence Ministry to prepare a programme of building aircraft carriers and new nuclear submarines, adding that “the money issue is not that important now”.

The officers of the Black Sea fleet know they have to be battle ready because their adversary is getting closer.

In August, the Moskva was put to sea to track NATO vessels which were despatched in the aftermath of Russia’s war with Georgia. NATO said they were delivering aid to Georgia, but Moscow saw them as encroaching on its sphere of influence.

Even in the home port that Ukraine’s government — which wants to join NATO — grudgingly rents to the Russian Black Sea Fleet, Western military power is hard to ignore.

As the Moskva sat at its moorings in Sevastopol, the U.S. navy survey ship Pathfinder, invited to visit by the Ukrainian military, steamed past and headed out to sea.

(Additional reporting by Christian Lowe; Editing by Charles Dick)

© Thomson Reuters 2008 All rights reserved.

Bookmark and Share

Big dog on the block: US ship packs a global punch

By ERIC TALMADGE – 8 hours ago

ABOARD THE USS GEORGE WASHINGTON (AP) — Rear Adm. Rick Wren’s office is near the flight deck, above the two nuclear reactors. When the mood strikes, he can take a short walk to the bridge and look out at his new neighborhood, though most of the time that’s just blue water from horizon to horizon.

Wren has a unique command.

No country in the world has anything like the USS George Washington. It is a floating air base with 67 aircraft ready to fly; it’s a city unto itself, with a population of around 5,000; and it’s an armory carrying about 4 million pounds of bombs.

It is, Wren likes to say, the big dog on the block.

And a big part of being the big dog is being seen.

An FA-18 Hornet prepares for a takeoff on the deck of the USS George Washington in the western Pacific Monday, Oct. 20, 2008. The George Washington, the crown jewel of the U.S. 7th Fleet, is a floating air base with 67 aircraft ready to fly; it is city unto itself, with a population of around 5,000; and it is an armory of mind-boggling proportion, carrying somewhere around 4 million pounds of bombs. (AP Photo/Eric Talmadge)

Just two weeks into its maiden voyage in the Pacific, the GW has been to Japan, which is its new home port, South Korea and Guam. It will be at sea probably about half the year, supplied by incoming cargo planes and desalinating its own water.

Down in the hangar bay, the scuttlebutt among the sailors is that a Chinese sub is out there somewhere chasing the carrier and its battle group — a pair of cruisers, plus a sub and a destroyer, which Wren also commands.

Wren doesn’t doubt for a minute that he is being watched. That is, after all, part of the game.

But he is coy when it comes to specifics.

“Most of what I do is classified,” he said.

Especially when it comes to the other big dog out there — China.

___

“Enemy” and even “threat” are words officers aboard the George Washington avoid.

“China” is another.

Wren, the most senior officer aboard, is no exception regarding the first two. But he is quick to talk about China and the challenges it poses.

“This is where the submarines that we look for live and operate,” Wren said. “I look for, and count the best I can, Chinese submarines twice a day.”

Wren said that when the aircraft carrier is embarked, one of its primary missions is to “sanitize” the seas around it. That means using active and passive sonar, helicopters and a whole slew of secret gadgetry to inspect a large chunk of the surrounding waters for Chinese submarine activity.

“They are tough to hunt,” he said.

Encounters rarely are made public. But two years ago, off Okinawa and far from Chinese waters, a Chinese submarine came within torpedo range of the USS Kitty Hawk — the George Washington’s predecessor in the Pacific Ocean.

The following year, the Kitty Hawk was at the last minute denied a port call in Hong Kong, and China has never offered an explanation.

Occurring while the Chinese military, and particularly its submarine capabilities, are rapidly modernizing, these and other incidents have left many U.S. military planners concerned.

Traditionally, much of the U.S. focus has been on China’s hostility toward Taiwan, which it sees as a secessionist province. As the George Washington began its Pacific cruise, Washington and Beijing were again at odds over a multibillion dollar weapons deal the U.S. had just signed with Taipei.

But Wren said China increasingly presents a broader strategic rivalry.

“Our presence, we believe, adds to the stability and security of the Pacific theater,” Wren said. “We all encourage China to become a responsible global participant. But the way they are growing their military is confusing. Why do you need a missile that can go thousands and thousands of kilometers if you are a defensive force? The total number of submarines they have, and their capabilities, sure doesn’t point to a defensive or even an ‘active defense force,’ as they like to call it.

“To me, it points to establishing an offensive, blue-water navy.”

Wren stressed, however, that “no one wants a confrontation with China.”

“If we go to war, something very wrong has happened,” he said. “I’m not in that business. I am in the business of being prepared.”

___

Aircraft carriers are an exceptional weapon.

They cost about $5 billion apiece. Of the Navy’s 12, only the George Washington is permanently deployed overseas.

The carrier is the crown jewel of the U.S. 7th Fleet, a huge armada of 60 to 70 ships, 200 to 300 aircraft and 20,000 sailors and Marines, most of whom are, like the George Washington, home based just south of Tokyo so that they can be closer to whatever missions may arise in their area of responsibility.

That is a vast expanse of the globe.

The fleet is responsible for everywhere from the international dateline to the east coast of Africa, pole to pole — in all, 52 million square miles. Within its watery realm operate ships from five of the world’s largest militaries — China, Russia, India and North and South Korea.

More than half of the world’s population lives within the 7th Fleet’s ambit, and the region accounts for more than $435 billion in two-way trade with the United States, more than any other region of the world. Nearly all of the U.S. commerce with Asia moves by sea.

“The balance of power is always shifting, and certainly the influence that this portion of the world has compared to Europe is shifting,” said Capt. Karl Thomas, the ship’s executive officer. “These countries are growing at a much greater rate than some of the countries in other parts of the world, and certainly there are some — tensions may not be the best word — but frictions.”

Strategists like to single out one vital sea lane and one commodity: the Strait of Malacca, and oil.

Each year, over 50,000 ships transit the strait, which is a major chokepoint for oil being transported from the Middle East to the countries in the Pacific Rim. Closure of the strait, between Singapore and Indonesia, would require nearly half of the world’s ships to reroute, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, and threaten the flow of more than 15 million barrels of oil per day.

The George Washington’s mere presence, Thomas says, is possibly the strongest statement the U.S. can make that it is committed to stability in the region — to keeping that oil flowing and that economy growing.

___

At the front of a ready room for fighter pilots attached to the George Washington’s Carrier Air Wing 5, a photo of Mao Zedong, Communist China’s founding father, is projected onto a white board above the caption, “We Stood Up.”

Experts from MIT and the Naval Postgraduate School have just finished a get-to-know-the-neighborhood lecture, focusing on regional politics, and the pilots are breaking up into little groups to digest what they have learned.

If a crisis occurs, these pilots, mostly young men in their 20s, are sure to be in the thick of it.

But Capt. Michael White, the air wing commander, says that for the pilots the location of the ship — be it the western Pacific or the Gulf off Bahrain — doesn’t matter that much. They are trained to fly multiple missions and are prepared to use their fighters in many conditions and theaters.

When deployed in this complicated and increasingly crowded sea, however, politics can’t be completely ignored.

“Working in this area of the world, we have to be knowledgeable of the major players, their governments, their economies and their capabilities,” he said.

On that last topic, he said, the George Washington speaks for itself.

An aircraft carrier is one thing the Chinese don’t have, and aren’t likely to acquire for quite some time, though there has been a lot of talk that they want one.

In the meantime, White has a dog analogy of his own.

“The way I see it is that there are a lot of sheep out there, and some wolves,” White said. “We are the sheepdogs.”

Bookmark and Share

USS Freedom visits Cleveland to show off new class of warship

Posted by James Ewinger/Plain Dealer Reporter
November 13, 2008 23:51PM
Cleveland.com

The USS Freedom could be the punch line for a great riddle, because no one would ever guess that a 3,100-ton, 377-foot warship could go more than 50 mph.

But it can, and did Thursday when it steamed into the Port of Cleveland after a high-speed pirouette around the five-mile crib. It remains through Saturday and is open for public tours today.

The Freedom resembles no warship on the water today, with a matte-aluminum superstructure that looks like a very large piece of origami.

It is the first of the Navy’s new Littoral Combat Ships — vessels designed to carry the fight right up to someone else’s shoreline.

It draws 14 feet of water, a bit less than the old Fletcher-class Destroyers of World War II. But the Fletchers and most surface vessels have displacement hulls, which plow through the water.

At speed, it skims the water, said the Freedom’s executive officer, Commander Kris Doyle. “You hardly feel it.”

Traditional warships have been adapted for new kinds of warfare, but that usually has required extensive, costly retrofitting.

The Freedom class and competing Independence class of LCS vessels are more like nautical Game Boys. With modular mission packages, they can quickly change from minesweepers to sub chasers to a launch platform for remotely piloted aircraft and boats.

And they can do all that on a vessel roughly the length of the old Fletchers, but with a crew of 40 instead of the 300 on an older destroyer.

Building began in Marinette, Wis., in 2005; it was christened in 2006 and commissioned last week in Milwaukee. The Freedom is making her way through the Great Lakes, up the St. Lawrence and then on to a year of testing and evaluation in Virginia. Along the way the ship is stopping at about a dozen U.S. and Canadian cities.

Looking down the barrel of the automated 57 mm gun on the foredeck of the USS Freedom, which is docked at downtown Cleveland through Saturday. Photo Gus Chan/Plain Dealer Reporter

Her captain, Commander Donald Gabrielson, said the program is remarkable because ship-development programs usually take 20 years from conception to final product. “Five years ago, this ship was just a rough sketch,” he said with quiet Midwestern pride.

There is no wheel, binnacle, rudder or propeller. Control is through joysticks. Power comes from two diesel engines the size of railroad locomotives and two gas turbines of the sort that power airliners. Using either system, or both in tandem, water is pumped out of four water jets at the rate of 12 million gallons a minute, making the vessel into a giant Jet Ski.

The fighting heart of the Freedom is composed of three large empty chambers called reconfigurable space 1, reconfigurable space 2, and the waterborne mission space in the stern. The first two receive the large mission modules that allow the Freedom to shape-shift - what Doyle calls the plug-and-play ability. The stern chamber is for small manned and unmanned watercraft that could launch from the stern or starboard side.

But for all of its starship flourishes, there are enough details on board to remind that this is a Navy warship: From the deckline to the water, it remains haze gray. The Freedom’s watertight doors, the companionways and hatches, draped fire hoses, and even the Aldis signal lamps could be found on Navy ships throughout much of the 20th century.

The food also remains great, according to Doyle - a longstanding point of pride on all Navy and Coast Guard vessels. But there is one concession to the reduced work force.

“Everyone eats out of the same galley, and everyone busses his own table and washes his own tray, including the captain,” Doyle said. When she becomes the Freedom’s captain next spring, she’ll step right into that new tradition.

USS Freedom
It’s capable of various missions including mine and anti-submarine warfare, surface combat and humanitarian missions.

Specs

Weight: 3,100 tons
Length: 377 feet
Beam: 58 feet
Draft: 13 to 14 feet
Speed: More than 40 knots (46 mph)

Propulsion
2 Rolls Royce MT-30 gas turbines
2 Fairbanks Morse 16PA6B diesels
4 Rolls Royce waterjets

Weapons
Mk 31 Rolling Airframe anti-missile Missile System
Mk 110 United Defense 57-mm gun
Multiple M2 .50-caliber machine guns

Crew
60 sailors, 20 with an aviation detachment

SOURCE: U.S. Navy

Bookmark and Share

Russia to scrap all decommissioned nuclear submarines by 2012

Friday, November 14, 2008

By Ria Novosti. Europe, 05:02 PM IST
India E News

Severodvinsk (Russia), Nov 14 (RIA Novosti) Russia will scrap all decommissioned nuclear-powered submarines by the beginning of 2012, a shipyard official said Friday.

‘All decommissioned Russian nuclear submarines will be disposed of in 2010, or no later than the start of 2012,’ said Vladimir Nikitin, director general of the Zvezdochka ship-repairing facility in Severodvinsk in northern Russia.

Nikitin said more than 200 out of 250 nuclear submarines built in Russia have so far been scrapped, many of them with financial support from other countries like Norway, Japan and Britain.

The official said the programme to dismantle nuclear submarines from the Northern Fleet had almost been completed and the majority of vessels due to be scrapped are currently with the Pacific Fleet.

‘At present, we must focus on the Pacific Fleet because the dismantling process is slower there,’ Nikitin said.

Zvezdochka is Russia’s biggest shipyard for repairing and dismantling of nuclear-powered submarines. According to Nikitin, the shipyard has the capacity to dismantle up to four nuclear submarines per year.

During the process of dismantling, spent nuclear fuel is removed from the submarine’s reactors and sent to storage, the hull is cut into three sections, and the bow and stern sections are removed and destroyed. The reactor section is sealed and transferred to storage.

Bookmark and Share

Crew member caused tragedy on Russian nuclear sub

16:51 | 13/ 11/ 2008

MOSCOW, November 13 (RIA Novosti) - A crew member activated without permission a fire safety system on board the Russian nuclear submarine Nerpa, causing the deaths of 20 people, investigators said on Thursday.

“Military investigators have determined the person who activated, without permission or any particular grounds, a fire safety system on board the submarine. He is a sailor from the crew, and he has already confessed,” said Vladimir Markin, a spokesman for the Investigation Committee of the Prosecutor General’s Office.

Criminal charges have already been brought against the crew member, and he faces up to seven years in jail.

Meanwhile, an expert from the investigative commission said the probe must determine how the sailor managed to gain unauthorized access to the system.

“Only senior commanding officers have access to the fire safety system. It is impossible to simply activate the system, which is protected from unauthorized activation by multiple levels of confirmation,” the official said.

“We must find out how a person without authorization managed to activate the system and determine whether the same situation could occur again,” he said.

The tragedy occurred late on Saturday while the Nerpa was undergoing sea trials in the Sea of Japan. Three submariners and 17 shipyard workers died in the accident. There were 208 people, 81 of them submariners, on board the vessel at the time.

Investigators earlier established that the fire safety system that was thought to have malfunctioned was in order.

The submarine’s reactor was not affected by the accident, which occurred in the nose of the vessel, and radiation levels on board remained normal.

The sub will resume sea trials after the conclusion of the investigation, a spokesperson for Russia’s Amur Shipbuilding Plant said on Thursday.

“The Russian Navy has said it will still commission the submarine, therefore, the sea trials will continue after the investigation and certain technical adjustments. The previous shipyard team will participate in future trials,” Marina Radayeva said.

The Nerpa started sea trials on October 27.

The incident is the worst for the Russian Navy since the sinking of the Kursk nuclear submarine in 2000 when all 118 sailors died.

The construction of the Akula II class Nerpa nuclear attack submarine started in 1991, but was suspended for over a decade due to a lack of funding. Akula II class vessels are considered the quietest and deadliest of all Russian nuclear-powered attack submarines.

Based in the Russian Far Eastern city of Komsomolsk-on-Amur, the Amur Shipbuilding Plant has built 270 vessels, including the Nerpa and another 55 nuclear submarines since it was established in 1936.

Bookmark and Share

Russia buries first dead in submarine accident

Wed Nov 12, 2008 8:57pm IST

KOMSOMOLSK-ON-AMUR, Russia (Reuters India) - Twelve of the Russian men killed in an accident on board a nuclear submarine were buried with military honours on Wednesday near the shipyard where they worked.

Twenty people died on Saturday when the fire extinguishing system went off unexpectedly on board the Nerpa submarine, releasing toxic freon gas into the compartments and asphyxiating the victims.

Many of those aboard were technicians from the ship-building plant in Komsomolsk-on-Amur, near Russia’s Pacific coast, which built the submarine. They were on board conducting sea trials when the accident happened.

Reuters Television pictures showed several thousand people waiting outside the plant to file past the open coffins.

The coffins were then taken in a procession through the streets to a cemetery. Relatives wept over them before they were lowered into the ground. A military guard of honour fired a salute over the graves.

The funerals of the other victims are expected to take place in the next few days.

“It is a tragedy for the whole town,” said Olga Starodumova, whose husband works at the plant.

“I had to come,” said another mourner, Natalya Viktorova. “My soul aches for all of them.”

The accident on board the Nerpa raised new questions about the capability of the Russian navy, despite a drive by the Kremlin to restore its lost military might.

It was the worst accident to hit the Russian navy since an explosion on the Kursk submarine in 2000 killed all 118 sailors on board.

The chief of the Russian military’s General Staff, Nikolai Makarov, said on Wednesday the navy planned to put the Nerpa into active service by the start of next year, Interfax news agency reported.

“Despite the sad accident in which people perished, during trials this submarine showed reliable functioning of all units, mechanical assemblies and control systems, obviously apart from the fire extinguishing system,” Interfax quoted him as saying.

© Thomson Reuters 2008 All rights reserved

<---End of Quote--->

Related Article:
Russian Navy: Accident submarine to join navy soon

7 hours ago

MOSCOW (AP) — Russia’s top military officer has been quoted as saying the navy will soon commission the nuclear submarine that suffered a deadly accident during a sea trial.

The Nerpa submarine was undergoing tests Saturday in the Sea of Japan when navy officials say its firefighting system switched on in error. Freon gas asphyxiated 20 people on the sub and hospitalized 21.

Russian and Indian media say Russia was going to lease the sub to India.

But Gen. Nikolai Makarov, chief of the Russian General staff, says the Nerpa submarine will join Russia’s navy soon after an official probe into the accident is over and the submarine’s firefighting flaws are fixed.

Russian news agencies quoted Makarov as saying Wednesday that other systems on the sub worked fine.

Bookmark and Share

U.S Navy: A six-hour blaze damaged a special-warfare minisub Sunday

Navy to start probe of sub fire

By Gregg K. Kakesako
Star Bulletin

POSTED: 01:30 a.m. HST, Nov 11, 2008

The Navy will begin investigating today a battery fire that damaged the nation’s only special-warfare minisub, a costly and problem-plagued stealth boat that was getting a recharge at Pearl Harbor’s 22-acre SEAL facility on Waipio Peninsula.

The Navy has not yet determined the cause of the fire or the extent of damage.

The black, 65-foot Advanced SEAL Delivery System minisub was undergoing routine maintenance in its shore-based facility at 8:30 p.m. Sunday when Navy personnel monitoring the battery recharging process noticed sparks and flames coming from near some of the battery compartments, officials said.

The building was immediately evacuated, and seven trucks and 25 federal firefighters responded but it took six hours to extinguish the fire and cool any remaining hot spots in the battery compartment, the Navy reported yesterday.

A investigation, led by the Naval Special Warfare Command and supported by experts from Naval Sea Systems Command and the Navy Safety Center, was expected to begin today.

The battery-powered minisub, designed to ride piggyback on an attack sub to within range of a hostile coast or other target, has been part of a troubled program that began in 1992. The vessel was delivered to the U.S. Naval Special Warfare Command in 2001 and assigned to Pearl Harbor’s SEAL Delivery Vehicle Team 1 in 2003.

There were initial problems with its propeller system, then problems with the electrical system and batteries.

A 2003 General Accounting Office report said the electrical system repeatedly shorted out and drained its silver-zinc batteries more quickly than the Navy projected. The zinc batteries were replaced with lithium-ion batteries.

The GAO report said the program, which initially called for six vessels, was to cost $527 million but rose to more than $2 billion.

Defense Industry Daily reported in April that “technical, reliability, and 400 percent cost overrun issues proved nearly insuperable.” Plans for six subs were halted in 2006, and the remaining ongoing effort was directed “to boost the performance of the existing sub and complete its operational testing,” the publication said.

The cigar-shaped minisub, which weighs 60 tons, is big enough to accommodate 16 SEALs, including two operators.

Advanced SEAL Delivery System minisub
» In service: 1 (Pearl Harbor)
» Length: 65 feet
» Weight: 60 tons
» Crew: Pilot, submarine officer; co-pilot, SEAL officer
» Payload: Up to 16 SEALs
» Mission: Clandestine infiltration
» Range: Classified (at least 115 miles on a battery charge; can dive as deep as 200 feet)
» Transported: Piggyback on the deck of a nuclear attack submarine

Source: U.S. Navy

Bookmark and Share

Russian Navy: What happened on the Nerpa?

16:25 | 10/ 11/ 2008

MOSCOW. (RIA Novosti military commentator Ilya Kramnik) - An accident on the Nerpa nuclear-powered submarine claimed 20 lives, the largest number of casualties since the sinking of the Kursk submarine in 2000. The Russian and international press are highlighting the tragedy because it happened on a nuclear submarine, engendering many rumors.

We will know the details only when a government commission completes its investigation, but we can discuss the essence of the tragedy. First, to be clear, the submarine was not on combat duty but was still undergoing trials.

What happened on the Nerpa was a catastrophe, an accident that claimed human life. Officially, the tragedy was provoked by the unauthorized operation of the fire extinguishing system.

Next, Russian submarines are equipped with two fire extinguishing systems, an air-foam system designed to extinguish local fires, and a smothering line system for extinguishing three-dimensional fires (with the exception of powder and ammunition fires), which releases Freon or its derivatives into the endangered compartment, replacing oxygen to extinguish the fire.

Freon is very effective for extinguishing 3D fires but is highly toxic and is therefore a risk to any people who come in contact with it. This justified risk in a submarine is partly compensated by portable breathing apparatuses for the crew.

Manual initiation is required to activate the Freon system in a third-generation submarine, such as the Akula II class Nerpa nuclear attack submarine. There is one previous case recording a Freon release into the wrong compartment. It happened on a K-77 submarine in 1976 and was due to an assembly mistake made during repairs. The wrong number was painted on the wrong system at the shipyard.

All Russian submarines use this system, and we must assume that the Nerpa uses it as it has not been reported otherwise.

The crewmembers have access to portable breathing apparatuses, which ensure between 10 and 30 minutes of survival depending on the intensity of breathing. The oxygen is used faster under hard work.

The command post can order a Freon release only if the fire alarm sounds or if they receive the necessary alert verbally via the audio system. It is true that fire alarm systems sometimes malfunction, which puts special emphasis on communication between the command post and the affected compartment. Freon activation is not automatic when the fire alarm goes off. The Nerpa was completed only recently and was undergoing sea trials, which is why it had 81 sailors and over a hundred civilian specialists - workers and engineers from the shipyard, 208 in all. Most civilians lack military survival skills, but they work with sailors during trials to evaluate the systems.

What happened in the submarine’s nose, where torpedoes are stocked?

The authorities say the 21 injured have no burns, which means there was no fire. There could be minor sources of fire and hence smoke in the compartment, which would have activated the fire alarm. As a result, the command post or somebody in the compartment may have decided to release Freon into the first and second compartments.

This made the atmosphere in the first (and possibly second) compartment unbreathable, and therefore lethal. Of the total number of victims (41), 36 were civilian specialists, who were most likely affected because they had not been trained or, less likely, because of a limited number of breathing apparatuses.

Workers and engineers taking part in building and testing submarines should be trained in survival procedures, including fire and the possible release of Freon.

And lastly, why were nearly three times more people on board during the sea trial? Overcrowding can only lead to commotion and disorder.

We can only hope that the proper conclusions will be drawn from the tragedy, and that it will not be repeated on the Nerpa or any other submarine.

The opinions expressed in this article are the author’s and do not necessarily represent those of RIA Novosti.

Bookmark and Share

U.S.A : Rosy Future for Navy’s Troubled Shoreline Fighters?

By David Axe
November 09, 2008 | 8:50:44 AM
Wired

Saturday, at a ceremony in Wisconsin, the Navy commissioned USS Freedom, the first of 55 planned Littoral Combat Ships. “An innovative combatant designed to operate quickly in shallow water environments to counter challenging threats in coastal regions, specifically mines, submarines and fast surface craft,” is how the Navy puts it.

“Innovative” is right: The ship can accelerate from zero to 40 knots in just a couple minutes — and navigate waters as shallow as 20 feet. Using manned and unmanned helicopters plus different plug-and-play “mission modules,” LCS can perform anti-submarine, counter-mine or surface-warfare missions.

But LCS has been a programmatic disaster. Seven of the first 11 ships have been canceled due to cost overruns — and last year the Navy even canned the officer overseeing the the program. Congress has imposed a price cap of $440 million per ship, but costs for those initial vessels “remain uncertain,” the GAO reports. Estimates for the first four LCSs and their mission modules range from $500 to $600 million apiece.

Still, LCS has the potential to revolutionize the Navy’s surface fleet, according to Bob Work, an analyst at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. Work’s analysis has been influential in shaping Navy plans in recent years — his studies helped drive the decision to curtail the DDG-1000 stealth destroyer. If he’s bullish on LCS, you can bet the Navy is, too.

“I firmly believe that if the first two ships, LCS 1 and 2, deliver on the performance that the Navy has asked them to have, the LCS is going to be one of best deals the U.S. Navy has made since World War II,” Work tells Danger Room. He said LCS is “totally congruent with shifting from a force that is based on the number of ships to a force that is a true total-force battle network, where all the things work together to give you something that’s more than sum of its parts.”

“When the Navy decided go to LCS, it said it wanted replace 56 ships on a one-for-one basis,” including frigate and minesweepers. “When you take a look at the replacement cost for those ships, even if LCS comes in at [an average cost of] $550 million, which I don’t believe will happen, you will replace 56 ships on a one-for-one basis for no more than 20 percent more than the replacement costs for those ships.”

That’s a terrific value, and those ships can be used for almost anything. If the submarine threat goes up, can buy more ASW modules… You can make [Special Operations]-support modules, disaster-relief modules. You can put a reinforced company of Marines on these things and speed them to wherever you need to go.

Work said the Navy could even add an Aegis radar and launch cells for anti-air missiles to turn LCS into a mini air-defender. More importantly, LCS can carry a bunch of fast, small boats or robots and, with its size and speed, operate in large, flexible groups of warships.

It’s a small battlefield network combatant, and it’s got lots of payload for its displacement. And it will be a test platform for unmanned systems. … The U.S Navy is way ahead of the curve with LCS.

The only big question in Work’s mind is: will the Navy buy just 55 of the new inshore fighters? “I don’t think so,” he said.

Bookmark and Share

First Littoral Combat Ship Commissioned By U.S. Navy

Last update: 12:00 p.m. EST Nov. 8, 2008
Market Watch

MILWAUKEE, Nov 08, 2008 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ — The nation’s first Littoral Combat Ship — USS Freedom (LCS 1) — was commissioned by the U.S. Navy in Milwaukee, WI today, officially placing the Lockheed Martin [LMT:Lockheed Martin Corporation (Holding Company) LMT 78.75, +1.93, +2.5%] designed and constructed vessel into active service.

The agile 378-foot USS Freedom — a survivable, semi-planing steel monohull — will help the Navy defeat growing littoral, or close-to-shore, threats and provide access and dominance in coastal water battlespace. Displacing approximately 3,000 metric tons and reaching speeds well over 40 knots, USS Freedom is a fast, maneuverable and networked surface combatant with operational flexibility to execute focused missions such as mine warfare, anti-submarine warfare, surface warfare and the potential for a wide range of additional missions including maritime interdiction and humanitarian/disaster relief.

“We are proud and excited to show the world this amazing ship,” said LCS Commanding Officer Cmdr. Don Gabrielson. “LCS is here and it changes the game. Freedom has more in common with an aviation squadron than a surface ship, and her sailors will blow you away with their ability to innovate.”

“This is truly an exciting time for the U.S. Navy and the entire LCS program team as the nation’s first Littoral Combat Ship is commissioned,” said Dan Schultz, vice president and general manager of Lockheed Martin’s Integrated Defense Technologies line of business. “I am extremely proud of all the men and women who worked tirelessly to bring USS Freedom to the fleet.”

In 2004, the Navy awarded a contract to the Lockheed Martin team to develop the first LCS. Construction began in February 2005 and USS Freedom was christened and launched in September 2006. The ship successfully completed sea trials in August 2008, achieving results superior to most first-of-class ships, and was delivered to the Navy in September 2008. This represents less than half the time typically required to design, build, launch and deliver a first-in-class combatant. Now formally commissioned, USS Freedom will transit out of the Great Lakes to Norfolk, VA and will eventually be homeported in San Diego, CA.

The Lockheed Martin-led LCS industry team includes naval architect Gibbs & Cox, ship builders Marinette Marine Corporation, a subsidiary of The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (MTW:The Manitowoc Company, Inc MTW 9.03, +0.33, +3.8%) , and Bollinger Shipyards, as well as best-of-industry domestic and international teammates to provide a flexible, low-risk warfighting solution.
Headquartered in Bethesda, MD, Lockheed Martin is a global security company that employs about 140,000 people worldwide and is principally engaged in the research, design, development, manufacture, integration and sustainment of advanced technology systems, products and services. The corporation reported 2007 sales of $41.9 billion.

For additional information and pictures, visit our website:
http://www.lmlcsteam.com

Copyright (C) 2008 PR Newswire. All rights reserved

Russian sub accident kills more than 20

MOSCOW (AP) — An accident aboard a nuclear-powered Russian navy submarine doing a test run in the Pacific Ocean killed more than 20 people Sunday, the navy said.

The nuclear reactor aboard the submarine was operating normally and radiation levels were normal, navy spokesman Capt. Igor Dygalo said.

The accident occurred when a fire-extinguishing system went into operation in error aboard the submarine, Dygalo said. He said the dead included sailors and shipbuilders.

The submarine was heading back to shore on its own power, and 21 people injured in the accident were evacuated to a ship that was escorting the sub.

Russia’s navy has been plagued by deadly accidents, including the explosions that sank the nuclear-powered submarine Kursk in 2000, killing all 118 seamen aboard.

Sunday’s accident came as the Kremlin seeks to restore Russia’s naval reputation. A naval squadron is headed to Venezuela for joint exercises this month in a show of force near U.S. shores.

<---End of Quote--->

Related Article-1:
At least 20 die in accident on Russian nuclear sub

Sat Nov 8, 2008 9:08pm EST

By Guy Faulconbridge

MOSCOW (Reuters) - More than 20 people were killed and another 21 injured in an accident aboard a Russian nuclear submarine in the Pacific Ocean, the navy said on Sunday, in the worst submarine disaster since the Kursk sank eight years ago.

A Russian naval spokesman said 208 people were aboard the submarine when an accident involving the activation of a fire extinguishing system occurred during sea trials. He said the nuclear reactor was intact and radiation levels were normal.

But the death toll makes it the worst mishap for the accident-prone Russian navy since the Kursk nuclear submarine sank in the Barents Sea in 2000 with the loss of all 118 sailors.

“More than 20 people were killed on a nuclear submarine in the Pacific Ocean during routine testing as a result of the unsanctioned functioning of the fire extinguishing systems,” the navy spokesman, Igor Dygalo, said by telephone.

“The reactor section (of the submarine) is working properly,” he said. “The radiation levels on the ship are normal.”

Dygalo did not give the name or class of the submarine or specify where it was located. Some of those killed were from a shipbuilding company, he added. He said a Russian destroyer was taking the injured to the Far East coast.

President Dmitry Medvedev has been informed about the accident, the Kremlin press service said.

Former Kremlin chief Vladimir Putin, who had been president for just a few months at the time of the Kursk disaster, was criticized at home for his slow reaction to that incident.

Russia’s navy has suffered a string of fatal accidents, despite sharp increases in funding and Kremlin attempts to use its largely Soviet-era fleet to project an image of strength abroad and at home.

SUMBARINE TESTING

Russia’s navy said a Russian destroyer, the Admiral Tributs, was providing assistance and taking some of the injured crew from the submarine to port.

Dygalo did not say where the ships were but the Tributs is normally based at Vladivostok, Russia’s main Far Eastern naval port. State-owned RIA news agency said it would take about 10 hours for the destroyer to reach the coast.

The agency quoted a source in the Amur Shipbuilding Enterprise as saying the accident occurred aboard the Nerpa, a Project 971 Shchuka-B attack submarine, known inside NATO as an Akula-class submarine.

The Nerpa — which has been modernized in recent years — embarked on trials on the open seas late last month, according to local media. Construction of the Nerpa was started in 1991 but funding dried up in the chaos of the 1990s.

RIA quoted a highly placed official in the Pacific Fleet as saying the accident happened in the bow of the submarine, which was making its way back to the coast.

In August 2005, seven Russian sailors were freed with help from a British rescue crew after three days trapped inside an AS-28 mini-submarine 600 feet down in the Pacific with dwindling air supplies.

© Thomson Reuters 2008 All rights reserved

<---End of Quote--->

Related Article-2:
More than 20 killed in Russian nuclear sub accident: spokesman

09/11/2008 06h04

VLADIVOSTOK, Russia, (AFP) - More than 20 people were killed and another 20 injured when a fire extinguishing system was inadvertently activated aboard a Russian nuclear submarine in the Pacific Ocean, the Russian navy said Sunday.

“During sea trials of a nuclear-powered submarine of the Pacific Fleet the firefighting system went off unsanctioned, killing over 20 people, including servicemen and workers,” said Captain Igor Dygalo, the navy’s spokesman.

The accident did not apparently affect the submarine’s nuclear reactor. “The submarine is not damaged, its reactor works as normal, and background radiation levels are normal,” Dygalo stated.

Twenty-one people with varying degrees of injuries were evacuated from the submarine and taken to Vladivostok on board the destroyer Admiral Tributs, officials said.

“The ship is off the city’s coast and soon the injured will be brought to land, where they will be provided professional aid,” a source in the Pacific Fleet’s hospital told AFP.

A total of 208 people were aboard the submarine when the accident happened, but of those only 81 were servicemen while the others were naval technicians and specialists.

Dygalo told AFP that President Dmitry Medvedev was being kept informed about the situation by Defence Minister Anatoly Serdyukov and had already ordered a “full and meticulous” investigation of the incident.

The incident recalled the 2000 Kursk disaster, when 118 crewmen died when their nuclear submarine sank after an onboard explosion in the Barents Sea.

The Kremlin was harshly criticised at home and abroad for its sluggish and secretive response to the Kursk disaster, but seemed to be moving quickly to avoid a repetition this time.

Dygalo said Medvedev had also ordered the defence ministry to provide “all possible aid and support to the victims’ families.”

The submarine was carrying out sea trials when the accident occurred and the stricken vessel was ordered to put in to a port on Russia’s far east coast temporarily, he added.

The spokesman did not say exactly where the incident occurred or specify which port the submarine would return to.

Fire suppression systems on submarines are relatively sophisticated and may rely on chemical liquids. It was unclear however how the accidental activation of the system on the Russian sub resulted in the deaths and injuries.

According to a military expert quoted by Russian agencies, the malfunction could be due to “technical errors” by the personnel.

The submarine, accompanied by a rescue ship, the Sayani, was steaming towards a Russian Pacific Ocean port for temporary basing, Dygalo said.

“The sub is due to arrive at its destination Sunday at midday Moscow time (0900 GMT), but much will depend on weather conditions,” a high-ranking Pacific Fleet source was quoted by RIA Novosti as saying.

Military prosecutors in the Pacific Fleet launched an investigation of the incident.

The name and type of the submarine was not released.

However, a source in the Amur shipyard’s administration named the submarine as the K-152 Nerpa, a nuclear-powered sub of the Project 971 Shchuka-B type, or Akula-class by NATO classification, the RIA Novosti news agency reported.

In October officials from the Amur shipyard reported the launch of sea trials for the 8,140-tonne Nerpa, which was put into production in 1991.

According to the source quoted by RIA Novosti, the Nerpa was undergoing sea trials in the Russian part of the Japanese Sea, with senior engineers and the shipyard’s technicians on board as well as the military.

The Nerpa was due to be leased to the Indian navy, with New Delhi reportedly paying two billion dollars for the lease of two Akula-class submarines, with an option of buying them when the lease run out.

Since the Kursk disaster in August 2000, Russia has seen a string of accidents and mishaps with its naval submarines.

Nine sailors died aboard a K-159 submarine when it sank in the Barents Sea in August 2003 while being towed to port for decommissioning. Only one of the seamen on board was rescued alive.

In 2005, a mini-submarine of the Pacific Fleet got snared in a fishing net, leaving the crew trapped underwater with dwindling oxygen supplies.

A British rescue team using a high-tech mini-submarine managed to extract the Russian vessel and there was no loss of life.

Bookmark and Share

Brits Considering Letting Women On Submarines

Thursday, November 06, 2008

The Stupid Shall Be Punished

Vigilis covered this earlier, but I wanted to jump into the discussion on rumors the Royal Navy is considering designing their replacement for the Vanguard-class SSBNs such that they can accomodate mixed gender crews. From this Daily Mail article:

The next generation of Britain’s nuclear submarines are being designed to carry female sailors as the Ministry of Defence is considering scrapping a long-standing ban on women submariners.

Defence officials confirmed that the current rules barring the Royal Navy’s 3,700 female sailors from serving in the submarine branch are ‘under review’, and said design work on a £20billion new fleet of nuclear-missile submarines was taking into account ‘the possibility of women serving on submarines in the future.’

The Navy is facing a shortage of suitably-qualified engineers willing to serve for months at a time beneath the waves, and officials believe legal challenges based on gender equality laws could eventually make the current policy untenable, forcing them to adopt mixed crews.

Other nations have already accepted women into submarining, and at least for the Aussies, it looks like this hasn’t fixed their “manning” shortages. Although a civilian advisory panel at the end of the Clinton Administration recommended women be allowed on U.S. submarines, the idea really hasn’t gotten anywhere in the last 8 years; it’s still enough of an outrageous idea to be a source of the New York Times April Fool’s joke this year. (OK, so it was really the guys from SubSim who came up with that, but it’s still not a mainstream idea.) The Brits are at least smart enough to recognize that a submarine would have to be designed from the ground up to accommodate women. I wrote earlier about the problems you’d have if you attempt to put women on a submarine that’s not designed for them:

The biggest problem I see is that either you’d have men and women in much closer quarters that you do on surface ships, or you’d end up with empty racks in the “female only” berthing areas when people stay behind… not very good for morale when most of the crew is hot-racking. Plus, which head becomes the female head? And do you need to install an extra head in the goat locker and wardroom areas? Or just have a sign you put up depending on the gender of the occupant? (That’s what we did when we had female riders — except for middie ops, when boats will turn one head over to them for the night.)
Plus, we all know what “feminine products” would do to the san pump…

We all know that sometime this century the U.S. will put women on submarines; hopefully, though, it’ll be done the right way, and not rushed into half-assed. The question of the day is: Do you think the new Administration will try to rush half-assed into putting women on submarines?

posted by Bubblehead at 10:24 PM

Bookmark and Share

Italian navy recapitalises

DATE:03/11/08
SOURCE: Flight International

By Luca Peruzzi
Flight Global

To cope with new challenges from conventional and asymmetrical threats and provide a more flexible and capable organic capability, the Italian fleet air arm is involved in a recapitalisation programme that will see legacy rotary- and fixed-wing assets replaced with new-generation platforms including Agusta­Westland AW101 and NH Industries NH90 helicopters, and in the mid-term, Lockheed Martin F-35B Lightning IIs.

Meanwhile, navy fleet power projection capabilities are being significantly enhanced with the delivery in 2008 and entry into service next year of the Cavour aircraft carrier.

Although there was a 20% reduction in flying hours from 2004 to 2007, shrewd employment of available resources and accurate risk management has allowed the fleet air arm to continue to satisfy operational tasks, including advance training, in addition to international, NATO and European Union operational missions such as its deployment of helicopters in Afghanistan or on board vessels in the waters around the Horn of Africa.

Featuring one of the lowest ratios of personnel to aircraft (7:1) in the NATO naval aviation community, Italy’s fleet air arm has an inventory of around 90 rotary- and fixed-wing assets, with 200 pilots distributed between three air stations and six flying squadrons, including one with STOVL fighters. Introduced progressively into service since 2001, the AW101 fleet stands at 20 helicopters, with eight in anti-submarine/anti-surface (ASW/ASuW) configuration, four in helicopter early warning (HEW) configuration and eight configured asamphibious support helicopters (ASH).

Two additional AW101 ASW/ASuWs are to be received in 2009, with a requirement for two more. These will replace the Sikorsky SH-3D, which will be retired by next year, with the AW101 ASW/ASuW helicopters to be relocated from Luni in northern Italy to Catania in Sicily. The type will also later replace six combat search and rescue-configured SH-3Ds, equipped with machine guns and ballistic protection for amphibious operations.

“The entry into service of the AW101, equipped with HELRAS low-frequency active dipping sonar, has revolutionised ASW tactics and procedures, allowing one helicopter to cover maritime areas of dimensions inconceivable until a few years ago,” says Rear Adm Paolo Treu, head of the Italian fleet air arm.The navy is investing heavily in the development of tactics and procedures for bi-static and multi-static use of the HELRAS sonar.

In adverse sea conditions, the HELRAS-equipped AW101s achieved interesting results in an ASW-oriented Spontex exercise, which is held biannually in the Biscaglia Gulf, successfully challenging other Thales Underwater Systems Flash-mounted ASW helicopters. Integration activities with the MBDA Marte Mk2/S anti-ship missile system were conducted in 2008, and the entire fleet retrofit will be completed by September 2009.

The air arm has completed the final evaluation phase of Selex Galileo HEW-784 radar mounted on the AW101 HEW. Integration of inverse synthetic aperture radar with the HEW-784 is to start shortlyfor completion in 2012.

FLYING HOURS

The eight AW101 ASH variants have already logged around 1,800 flying hours (including 1,000 during NATO and national exercises) supporting both conventional and special forces. Each capable of carrying up to 25 soldiers, 11 litters or a light vehicle, the four aircraft in the second batch will be equipped with a more sophisticated mission suite, including digital maps, Selex new-generation identification friend-or-foe satellite communications radios, FLIR Systems Star Safire II electro-optical/infrared, a pilot-downed positioning system, and a defensive aid subsystem with Elettronica radar warning receivers, an EADS/Selex missile warning system, a Selex laser warning system, and a chaffs/flares intelligent dispenser suite. An ASH gunship configuration is being finalised.

The 30 or so ASW/ASuW and six heli-assault dedicated Agusta/Bell AB212s, will progressively be replaced by the NH90, to be acquired in 46 platforms for ASW/AsuW missions and 10 in a TTH navalised version for amphibious and special forces support duties. “We expect to receive the first ASW/ASuW fully equipped helicopter, including final operational mission suite, by 2011. To compensate for programme delivery delays, a number of AB212s will undergo a life-extension programme that will keep them in service until 2016, when the NH90 phase-in and operational certification will be completed,” Treu says.

The new NH90 in the ASW/ASuW and ASH versions will represent a major technological leap forward from the legacy AB212s, employing a fly-by-wire flight control system and an integrated mission system including a surface search radar, electronic support measures and an AW101 HELRAS dipping sonar equipped with a Selex Galileo-provided common acoustics processor used also for embarked acoustic buoys.

In addition to the three Piaggio P180 Maritime aircraft for surveillance and transport duties, the fixed-wing fleet is composed of 15 Boeing/Alenia Aeronautica AV-8B Harrier II Plus and two TAV-8B operational conversion aircraft. Based at Grottaglie air station near Taranto, the aircraft have air-to-air AMRAAM and Sidewinder missiles and can carry a range of air-to-ground armaments, including non-guided or guided laser munitions, thanks to a Rafael/Northrop Grumman Litening II targeting pod. The fleet air arm will also receive 227kg (500lb) JDAM munitions.

“These aircraft will be progressively replaced by 22 Joint Strike Fighters in the STOVL version,” says Treu.”The delivery schedule will begin in 2014 and will see two to three aircraft a year until 2020. One of the programme objectives is interoperability with other partners, maintaining the well-structured connection with the US Marine Corps.”

The F-35Bs will be carried on the new 27,500t Cavour aircraft carrier built by Fincantieri and fitted out with a combat system mostly provided by Finmeccanica companies. The carrier is equipped with a 6,800m2 (73,200ft2) flight deck, two 30t aircraft elevators anda 12° ski-jump ramp to port for STOVL aircraft operations.

It has landing slots for six AW101-type helicopters, plus eight parking slots (four on each side of the island structure). The Cavour’s hangar, meanwhile, has room for 12 AW101-type helicopters or eight AV-8B Harrier II Plus or F-35B Lightning IIs.

The Italian navy’s future flagship will be able to carry a combined air group of 20 current and future fleet air arm aircraft and helicopters and accommodate 1,205 personnel.

In addition to an extensive command and control suite, the ship’s combat management system also includes a comprehensive sensors, electronics and weapon system package, including RF and IR surveillance sensors, electronic support measures and a multifunction Selex Sistemi Integrati Empar radar for 3D detection, multiple target tracking and missile guidance for 48 vertically launched Eurosam SAAM-IT surface-to-air missile system, plus Oto Melara self-defence guns.

Bookmark and Share